I’ve been studying anti-design for a couple of years now and I think it’s genuinely misunderstood in our industry.
Most people think anti-design = ugly on purpose. But the best examples aren’t ugly. They’re intentionally breaking specific rules while following others with precision.
Brutalist web design: it violates visual hierarchy conventions but it understands structure. It just uses structure as tension rather than comfort.
Deliberately “broken” layouts: the misalignment is precisely measured. What looks like an accident is usually 8 iterations to get the exact pixel offset that reads as intentional chaos rather than mistake.
The failure mode is designers who use anti-design as a shortcut. Skip the fundamentals, call it anti-design. The work has no tension - it just looks undone.
The best anti-design I’ve seen comes from designers who know the rules so well they can fracture them at exactly the right point.
Is anyone here working in this space actively? Would love to see current examples.